Dr. Ralph Potkin - Current Research
The human body has been studied inside and out since the
beginning of, well, human bodies and few who read these lines lack appreciation
of the the medical arts, or of progress in the related sciences and technologies.
If we know of an event, a structure, process or state in the body of a living
human being, more than likely we can measure it with terrific precision and
even see it – often in real time and non-invasively. Be that as it may,
when Kirk Krack launched his career as a freediving pioneer , he quickly found
out that pioneers don’t get a lot of help from road maps or signs.
Uh, that’s how come they’re pioneers. The same medical and scientific
culture which could nonchalantly replace the heart of a living person had
precious little to say about apnea diving. Much of the conventional medical
wisdom could be summarized thus: No, you can’t do that. It’s impossible.
It is beyond the capabilities of the human body.
But… we were doing it, and had been doing it.
As Kirk’s infant Performance Freediving initiative developed he made
heavy and ongoing investments in science, which in the context of a struggling
and often impoverished enterprise was nothing less than visionary. It takes
a lot of belief and no small courage for a struggling entrepreneur (a guy
living on students’ and colleagues’ sofas) to sink time and money
into projects which have no immediate prospect of an economic payoff. Kirk’s
own curiosity, the same unquenchable thirst for exploration and adventure
which took him from the Saskatchewan prairie to a global oceaneering career,
was certainly one motivator but more importantly, Krack understood that there’s
a deep symbiosis between freediving’s vitality as a recreational and
competitive sport, on the one hand, and the empty shelf he’d discovered
in the great Library of Science.
Freediving needed science, and science needed freediving. Both are in the
business of boldly going where no-one has gone before, and there sure is where
to go.
A number of physicians and scientists have, over the years, passed through
the Performance Freediving world as clinic students, each adding new knowledge
to Kirk’s growing database but also taking away observations that have
fueled new research and analysis.
An early partnership struck with Simon Frasier University in Vancouver,BC,
continues with a regular program of activities, measurements, analysis and
reporting. So, too, it’s no coincidence that the Performance Freediving
Team’s newest member is a physician and an inventor of medical devices.
Dr. George ‘Doc’ Lopez, 58, is a US National record holder in
the Free Immersion discipline and Founder/CEO of ICU Medical Devices, a global
leader in safey medical systems. Doc Lopez is a walking ( and freediving)
example of the synergistic effects of practical experience and a scientific
background.
More recently a distinguished pulmonologist from the Cedars-Sinai Medical
Center in Los Angeles, Dr. Ralph Potkin, has been organizing an ambitious
program of freediving-related research. Dr. Potkin is no neophyte to dive
medicine. He’s been an active scuba diver since 1971 and has dived all
over the world - including Antarctica, for all you been-there-done-that braggarts.
He’s made hyperbaric medicine his primary specialty for the past ten
years and has founded the Beverly Hills Center for Hyperbaric Medicine. Potkin,
an alumnus of the Performance Freediving clinics, resided with the team during
the train-up for the Sink Faze Cayman 2006 World Record event and recorded
pre- and post-dive physiologicals from team and support freedivers.

Dr. Potkin’s scientific interest in freediving has roots in his earlier
study of decompression sickness in marine mammals. The finding that whales,
seals and dolphins can indeed suffer DCS prompted him to wonder about the
vulnerabilities of human freedivers. His current work is in the nature of
a pilot study, the intent of which is to develop a basis for a formal research
program. Read on - there's a role for you in this project.
Ralph Potkin wants to explore three basic research issues, the first of which
is whether, indeed, the phenomena associated with DCS can be observed in freedivers.
The measurement technologies are well-developed and have served the field
of scuba diving, buthad never been applied to systematic data collection in
freediving. The basic tool here is Doppler bubble detection. A small, rugged
device non-invasively detects bubbles in the blood vessels as the nitrogen
dissolved in tissues under hydrostatic pressure (at depth) expands under ambient
surface air pressure.
Ancillary questions address the frequency with which significant nitrogen
absorption occurs during freediving, the depth, time and other factors associated
with incidence, and, as a practical matter, mitigation. When and how are freedivers
at risk for DCS, and what can we do to prevent it?
Dr. Potkin recently disclosed that he’s found bubble formation in some
freedivers examined shortly after diving. He’s understandably reluctant
to be more specific at this early juncture, but it’s fair to say that
his findings on Grand Cayman and elsewhere favor moving forward with the research.
A second broad area of research underway centers on the issue of long-term
neurological effects of freediving. This is, of course, a hot-button item
with the general public and more than a few freedivers themselves. Who hasn’t
had a non-diving friend or relative declare that holding one’s breath
deprives the brain of oxygen and leads to certain neurological damage? So?
Is it true? Are we dumbing ourselves down?

It’s one of those things that ‘everybody knows’, but which
turns out to be not exactly so.
The evidence for the protective effects of the mammalian dive reflex under
apnea – diversion of blood to the most vital organs, bradycardia and
so forth – is strong and is, as Dr.Potkin reminds us, surprising to
the conventional medical wisdom. Having learned of a theretofore unknown homeostatic
mechanism which seems to allow for some degree of apnea without harmful consequence,
Dr. Potkin argues for asking the question at the margins. It may be that a
seemingly innocuous activity, one ‘provided for’ by human physiological
response, has consequences which become apparent only over time. Or, it may
be that there are immediate limits to the adaptation afforded by the diver
reflex: limitations of depth, time, frequency, other factors or combinations
of factors.
Dr. Potkin is addressing the neurological issue with a preliminary program
of brain imaging, focused on subjects who have a lengthy history of deep freediving.
I’ve been a subject in these imaging studies, and it is an astounding
and more than a bit disconcerting thing to see one’s own thinkum-dinkum
at work in high–res. I guess mine still works to some degree - there
were significant changes in my brain activity following a very annoying session
of computerized cognitive puzzle-solving.
The phenomenon we colloquially term ‘squeeze’ is the third major
area Dr.Potkin is interested in, with etiology (i.e., causes) and prophylaxis
(prevention) as his immediate medical concerns. He is, after all, a chest
doctor. He’s taken spirometry data from the Performance Freediving team
members and support freedivers during the Sink Faze trainup and collected
anecdotal data from as many freedivers as he could. Here, too, it is premature
to report anything in the nature of a finding. There is this, though: Dr.
Potkin has observed very significant increases in lung volume after what we
call 'packing’. Common knowledge, you say ? Duh ? Not so – Dr.
Potkin assures us that the medical community would poppycock the notion that
human lung volume can be increased from a non-pathological baseline by any
known intervention. You do it, but just so you know: it can’t be done.

I did it in June, 2006 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. Surrounded
by Dr. Potkin, some skeptical colleagues and technicians, and a few gazillion
dollars’ worth of state-of-the-art high-res full-motion imaging gizmos,
I have watched my own heart pumping blood: valves opening and closing, blood
flowing through the chambers just like in the textbooks. I filled my lungs,
stuffed 35 packs into ‘em, and watched the doctors’ numb fascination
as my right heart chambers were squeezed flat, blood backwashing toward the
lungs, and my blood pressure dropped in seconds to undetectable. All this
sitting upright, fully conscious.
If only I had one of those gizmos at home ! Ralph is in the know, but his
colleagues were shocked by what they witnessed. One told me that under normal
circumstances, the images he saw and the vital signs readouts accompanying
them would have thrown the hospital into a full-out emergency response.
The medical community has been surprised by previously unknown adaptive responses
in human apnea divers, homeostatic programming which enables us to dive far
deeper and longer than traditionally thought possible.
Dr. Potkin points out another thing that surprises the academics - the common
knowledge ( in the freediving community) that the dive reflex is conditioned.
Learned, and teach-able, too. Kirk Krack, for example, has shown ( over more
than 1,000 clinic students) that ‘naïve’ (i.e., completely
inexperienced) students can quickly be trained to accomplish breath-holds
that only a few years ago were the province of the sport’s elite.
The possibility that many, or most human beings have much more extensive apnea
capabilities than previously thought - much better, in a sense, than are neccesary
- goes back to the tantalizing Aquatic Ape Hypothesis. The threads are woven
together.
Dr. Potkin’s three research areas address issues of considerable practical
concern for freedivers. DCS used to be thought of as an issue for scuba divers,
but Dr. Potkin’s Doppler measurements have made it clear that there
is a real, though as yet unquantified exposure for apnea divers as well. As
performance parameters increase and more freedivers dive deeper and longer
this issue will very likely become of greater concern to more people.
Nor can one regard the prospect of neurological damage with equanimity –
we need to know more, and the sooner the better.
Finally, chest squeeze is a problem which has put a goodly number of our friends
and colleagues out of the freediving business temporarily or, in some cases,
permanently. Dr. Potkin sees the state of our knowledge in this area as primitive.
He concedes there is no decisive evidence for the origin of the blood components
seen in freedivers’ sputum from time to time. What, exactly is it, where
is it coming from and why? If there are ways to prevent or mitigate this class
of barotrauma, it were better we knew and practiced them
Since the Potkin research has direct and immediate consequences for the survival,
health and well-being of all freedivers, it seems to me we should be willing
to share our experience and knowledge with the investigator. What we have
is folklore – there’s a lot of good knowledge there, as the doctors
acknowledge – but it’s not systematized and doubtless includes
some bogus theorems and superstitions. We can teach science things it never
knew about the human body, things that may well have prophylactic and even
therapeutic implications way beyond the freediving scene. Science, in return,
can help us put our knowledge in order, guiding us to safer practices and
better performance.
There’s a way you can join in this effort and make a significant, immediate
contribution. No, don’t grab you wallet, it’s not money that’s
needed from you – it’s your experience and knowledge.

Copyright © 1999 Beverly Hills Center for Hyperbaric Medicine
call 310-551-1375